On 02/06/2013 08:10 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:39:11 -0500 > Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> We're now hitting the VM_BUG_ON() which was added in the last hunk of the >> patch: > > hm, why was that added. > > Michel, I seem to have confused myself over this series. I saw a > report this morning which led me to drop > mm-accelerate-munlock-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch but now I can't find > that report and I'm wondering if I should have dropped > mm-accelerate-mm_populate-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch instead. > > Given that and Sasha's new report I think I'll drop > > mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages.patch > mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages-fix.patch > mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages-fix-fix.patch > mm-accelerate-mm_populate-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch > mm-accelerate-munlock-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch > > and let's start again? I've sent a report regarding mm-accelerate-munlock-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch couple of hours ago (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/6/699). Reverting that patch fixed the issue reported, so I think you've dropped the right one. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>