On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > reset_page_last_nid() is poorly named. page_reset_last_nid() would be > better, and consistent. > Look at this closer, are you sure you want? Why is page_reset_last_nid() better or more consistent? The getter functions for page-related fields start with page (page_count, page_mapcount etc.) but the setters begin with set (set_page_section, set_page_zone, set_page_links etc.). For mapcount, we also have reset_page_mapcount() so to me reset_page_last_nid() is already consistent. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>