O_DIRECT on tmpfs (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hugh and others,

In 2007, there were some discussions on whether to allow opens to
specify O_DIRECT for files backed by tmpfs.[1][2] On the surface, it
sounds like a completely crazy thing to do.  However, distributions like
Fedora are now defaulting to using a tmpfs /tmp.  I'm not aware of any
applications that open temp files using O_DIRECT, but I wanted to get
some new discussion going on whether this is a reasonable thing to
expect to work.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
Jeff

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/4/55
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/482031

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]