Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive affinity"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > It is important to know how this was configured. I was running 
> > > one JVM per node and the JVMs were sized that they should fit 
> > > in the node. [...]
> > 
> > That is not what I tested: as I described it in the mail I 
> > tested 32 warehouses: i.e. spanning the whole system.
> > 
> 
> Good (sortof) [...]

Not just 'sortof' good but it appears it's unconditionally good: 
meanwhile other testers have reproduced the single-JVM speedup 
with the latest numa/core code as well, so the speedup is not 
just on my system.

Please post your kernel .config so I can check why the 4x JVM 
test does not perform so well on your system. Maybe there's 
something special to your system.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]