On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:13:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Hi, > > This is the latest iteration of our numa/core tree, which > implements adaptive NUMA affinity balancing. > > Changes in this version: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/315 > > Performance figures: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/330 > > Any review feedback, comments and test results are welcome! > For the purposes of review and testing, this is going to be hard to pick apart and compare. It doesn't apply against 3.7-rc5 and when trying to resolve the conflicts it quickly becomes obvious that the series depends on other scheduler patches such as sched: Add an rq migration call-back to sched_class sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking This is not a full list, it was just the first I hit. What are the other scheduler patches you are depend on? Knowing that will probably help pick apart some of the massive patches like "sched, numa, mm: Add adaptive NUMA affinity support" which is a massive monolithic patch I have not even attempted to read yet but the diffstat for it alone says a lot. 7 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-) -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>