* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd also like to add another, structural side note: you > > mixed new vm-stats bits into the whole queue, needlessly > > blowing up the size and the mm/ specific portions of the > > tree. I'd suggest to post and keep those bits separately, > > preferably on top of what we have already once it has > > settled down. I'm keeping the 'perf bench numa' bits > > separate as well. > > The stats part are fairly late in the queue. I noticed they > break build for !CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA but it was trivially > resolved. [...] Ok - the vm-stats bits are the last larger item remaining that I've seen - could you please redo any of your changes on top of the latest tip:numa/core tree, to make them easier for me to pick up? Your tree is slowly becoming a rebase of tip:numa/core and that will certainly cause problems. I'll backmerge any delta patches and rebase as necessary - but please do them as deltas on top of tip:numa/core to make things reviewable and easier to merge: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/core Thanks! Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>