Re: CMA and zone watermarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On 10/9/2012 6:43 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:12:21AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 10/9/2012 5:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:41:14PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:

Fortunately, recently, Bart sent a patch about that.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134763299016693&w=2

Could you test above patches in your kernel?
You have to apply [2/4], [3/4], [4/4] and don't need [1/4].

AFAIR without patch [1/4], free cma page counter will go below zero
and weird thing will happen, so better apply the complete patchset.

I can't understand your point. [1/4] is just fix for correcting trace
No?

I just remember we ran into such strange negative number of free cma pages issue without that patch, but maybe the final patchset will simply fail to apply without the first patch.

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]