Re: CMA and zone watermarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:41:14PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> It appears that when CMA is enabled, the zone watermarks are not properly
> respected, leading to for example GFP_NOWAIT allocations getting access to the
> high pools.
> 
> I ran the following test code which simply allocates pages with GFP_NOWAIT
> until it fails, and then tries GFP_ATOMIC.  Without CMA, the GFP_ATOMIC
> allocation succeeds, with CMA, it fails too.

Good spot. By wrong zone_watermark_check, it can consume reserved memory pool.

> 
> Logs attached (includes my patch which prints the migration type in the failure
> message http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134971041701306&w=2), taken on 3.6
> kernel.
> 

Fortunately, recently, Bart sent a patch about that.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=134763299016693&w=2

Could you test above patches in your kernel?
You have to apply [2/4], [3/4], [4/4] and don't need [1/4].

Thanks.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]