Re: [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>
> I remembered that 3 months ago when Alex tested the numa/sched patches
> there were 20% regression on SpecJbb2005 due to the numa balancer.

20% on anything sounds like a show stopper to me.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]