Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 01:50:42 +0200 > Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This is a new AutoNUMA27 release for Linux v3.6. > > Peter's numa/sched patches have been in -next for a week. Did they pass review? I have some doubts. The last time I looked it also broke numactl. > Guys, what's the plan here? Since they are both performance features their ultimate benefit is how much faster they make things (and how seldom they make things slower) IMHO needs a performance shot-out. Run both on the same 10 workloads and see who wins. Just a lot of of work. Any volunteers? For a change like this I think less regression is actually more important than the highest peak numbers. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>