On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 03:34, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:41:45PM +0800, Jingxiang Zeng wrote: > > From: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Added cgroup.memsw_account_on_dfl startup parameter, which > > is off by default. When enabled in cgroupv2 mode, the memory > > accounting mode of swap will be reverted to cgroupv1 mode. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 +++- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > index dcb087ee6e8d..96f2fad1c351 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > > @@ -62,10 +62,12 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie { > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG > > > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memsw_account_on_dfl); > > /* Whether enable memory+swap account in cgroupv2 */ > > static inline bool do_memsw_account_on_dfl(void) > > { > > - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMSW_ACCOUNT_ON_DFL); > > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMSW_ACCOUNT_ON_DFL) > > + || static_branch_unlikely(&memsw_account_on_dfl); > > Why || in above condition? Shouldn't it be && ? It seems that changing it to && is better, Thanks. > > > } > > > > #define MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT 16 > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > > index 768d6b15dbfa..c1171fb2bfd6 100644 > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > > @@ -5478,3 +5478,14 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_swap_init(void) > > subsys_initcall(mem_cgroup_swap_init); > > > > #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */ > > + > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memsw_account_on_dfl); > > +static int __init memsw_account_on_dfl_setup(char *s) > > +{ > > + if (!strcmp(s, "1")) > > + static_branch_enable(&memsw_account_on_dfl); > > + else if (!strcmp(s, "0")) > > + static_branch_disable(&memsw_account_on_dfl); > > + return 1; > > +} > > +__setup("cgroup.memsw_account_on_dfl=", memsw_account_on_dfl_setup); > > Please keep the above in memcontrol-v1.c > > > + > > \ No newline at end of file > > -- > > 2.41.1 > > >