Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/01/2012 10:36 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:33:12AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when
>> there isn't a huge zero page in use.
> 
> Is shinker-reclaimable huge zero page okay for you?
> 

Yes, I'm fine with that.  However, I'm curious about the relative
benefit versus virtual hzp from a performance perspective, on an
application where hzp actually matters.

One can otherwise argue that if hzp doesn't matter for except in a small
number of cases that we shouldn't use it at all.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]