Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/01/2012 10:26 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
>> It is well known that microbenchmarks can be horribly misleading.  What
>> led to Kirill investigating huge zero page in the first place was the
>> fact that some applications/macrobenchmarks benefit, and I think those
>> are the right thing to look at.
> 
> The whole point of the two microbenchmarks was to measure the worst
> cases for both scenarios and I think that was useful. Real life using
> zero pages are going to be somewhere in that range.
> 

... and I think it would be worthwhile to know which effect dominates
(or neither, in which case it doesn't matter).

Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when
there isn't a huge zero page in use.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]