Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] mseal system mappings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:01 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 04:17:01PM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 2:32 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW can we please drop the 'mseal, system mappings' prefixes on this
> > > series, it's really weird and makes it really hard for me to actually read
> > > the individual summary lines for each commit. 'mseal:' will do.
> > >
> >
> > I am not sure.
> > I had comments about adding mseal, system mappings, as prefixes, and I
> > think it is reasonable.
>
> No it's really horrible (sorry I know it's hyperbolic but it really really looks
> horrid to me) , I've never seen prefixes like that before in mm in my life and I
> don't think it adds anything.
>
> I also find it MIGHTY confusing.
>
> Please remove this :) you can git log the relevant files to see the conventions
> people use. Typically xxx: has something really short and sweet for the 'xxx'.
>
> I realise this is subjective, but it's a small thing and would be helpful for
> parsing your series at a glance.
>
I need a prefix to group the patches, especially when the first patch
is just a config change. "mseal" won't work because this patch isn't
about core business logic of mseal.

How about "mseal sysmap:"?

-Jeff





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux