On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:06PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Thanks very much! Yeah just keen to get this in as we are moving towards > > removing these fields very soon. > > My understanding is that this is a part of larger effort to reduce > struct page to 8 bytes and an optionally dynamically allocated slightly > larger structure, is that correct? Just curious. > > > Could you take this in your tree? I think that'd work best. > > Sure, will do. Hi, we don't see it in linux-next yet, did you take this patch? Or just not sync with -next? As we'd like to assess the current state of pending 6.15 for page->index, mapping usage to ensure we 'got' everything. Thanks, Lorenzo > > Thanks, > -- > Alex
