Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks very much! Yeah just keen to get this in as we are moving towards > removing these fields very soon. My understanding is that this is a part of larger effort to reduce struct page to 8 bytes and an optionally dynamically allocated slightly larger structure, is that correct? Just curious. > Could you take this in your tree? I think that'd work best. Sure, will do. Thanks, -- Alex
