Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: Do not access pgmap for non zone device pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/20/25 22:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.02.25 00:13, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> page_pgmap() is referenced before checking if the page is a zone
>> device page and this triggers the warning in page_pgmap(). Refactor
>> the code to use the helper function after relevant checks.
>>
>> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Fixes: 7f1cfd71153b ("mm: allow compound zone device pages") on
>> mm-unstable
> 
> Is there actually something broken? At least for now, reading folio->pgmap should just work, although it might be garbage.
> 

It triggers the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE

static inline struct dev_pagemap *page_pgmap(const struct page *page)
{
	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!is_zone_device_page(page), page);
	return page_folio(page)->pgmap;
}

Nothing is broken, because the code below has checks for is_device_coherent_page(),
but in general I think the WARN_ON is correct because it warns us against garbage
and it's propagation if the correct checks are not in place.


>>
>>   mm/migrate_device.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> index 6771893d4601..e0bf771edb6f 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> @@ -153,14 +153,17 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>                   goto next;
>>               }
>>               page = vm_normal_page(migrate->vma, addr, pte);
>> -            pgmap = page_pgmap(page);
>>               if (page && !is_zone_device_page(page) &&
>>                   !(migrate->flags & MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM))
>>                   goto next;
>> -            else if (page && is_device_coherent_page(page) &&
>> -                (!(migrate->flags & MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_DEVICE_COHERENT) ||
>> -                 pgmap->owner != migrate->pgmap_owner))
>> -                goto next;
>> +            else if (page && is_device_coherent_page(page)) {
>> +                pgmap = page_pgmap(page);
>> +
>> +                if (!(migrate->flags &
>> +                    MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_DEVICE_COHERENT) ||
>> +                    pgmap->owner != migrate->pgmap_owner)
>> +                    goto next;
>> +            }
> 
> Coding style wants you to use
> 
> if () {
> 
> } else if {
> 
> }
> 
> Not
> 
> if ()
> else if {
> 
> }
> 

Ack, checkpatch.pl missed it, but agreed

> 
> Something simpler might be
> 
> page_pgmap(page)->owner != migrate->pgmap_owner
> 

Yep, I had that and dropped it, the four clauses made it feel that it might
benefit from a split.

>>               mpfn = migrate_pfn(pfn) | MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE;
>>               mpfn |= pte_write(pte) ? MIGRATE_PFN_WRITE : 0;
>>           }
> 
> 

Thanks for the review!
Balbir




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux