On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:49:47 +0800 I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > if (ptl != pml) > > +out_unlock: > > spin_unlock(pml); > > } > > _ > > > > but that's really ugly. > > I agree. Would you be so nice to suggest some test method for me so I > can try to test how much benefit we can get from this? > > If the case happens frequently enough I think it might be worth it? I expect this error patch is basically never taken - put a printk in there and run some tests?
