When !start_pte is true, the branch for "start_pte" in "out_ptl" label
section is surely false, and "ptl != pml" must be true since "ptl" is
NULL in this case.
It means both branches in "out_ptl" are redundant, only one thing to be
done is to unlock "pml", make it directly unlock "pml" and return in
this case.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/pt_reclaim.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/pt_reclaim.c b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
index 7e9455a18aae..f5d5c42a4679 100644
--- a/mm/pt_reclaim.c
+++ b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ void try_to_free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
start_pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, &pmdval, &ptl);
- if (!start_pte)
- goto out_ptl;
+ if (!start_pte) {
+ spin_unlock(pml);
+ return;
+ }
if (ptl != pml)
spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
--
2.43.0
