On 09/24/2012 05:56 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: >> >>> The reason I say it is orthogonal, is that people will still want to see >>> their caches in /proc/slabinfo, regardless of wherever else they'll be. >>> It was a requirement from Pekka in one of the first times I posted this, >>> IIRC. >> >> They want to see total counts there true. But as I said we already have a >> duplication of the statistics otherwise. We have never done the scheme >> that you propose. That is unexpected. I would not expect the numbers to be >> there. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I myself personally believe it can potentially clutter slabinfo, and > won't put my energy in defending the current implementation. What I > don't want is to keep switching between implementations. > > Pekka, Tejun, what do you guys say here? So Christoph is proposing that the new caches appear somewhere under the cgroups directory and /proc/slabinfo includes aggregated counts, right? I'm certainly OK with that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>