On 09/24/2012 05:56 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> The reason I say it is orthogonal, is that people will still want to see >> their caches in /proc/slabinfo, regardless of wherever else they'll be. >> It was a requirement from Pekka in one of the first times I posted this, >> IIRC. > > They want to see total counts there true. But as I said we already have a > duplication of the statistics otherwise. We have never done the scheme > that you propose. That is unexpected. I would not expect the numbers to be > there. > I myself personally believe it can potentially clutter slabinfo, and won't put my energy in defending the current implementation. What I don't want is to keep switching between implementations. Pekka, Tejun, what do you guys say here? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>