On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:46:04AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 21.01.25 02:03, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 20:47 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > > On 20.01.25 03:40, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > > Every pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call ends up calling
> > > > > tlb_remove_table.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, but the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT variant
> > > > paravirt_tlb_remove_table()
> > > > however calls tlb_remove_page().
> > >
> > > Patch 1/12 from this series removes that.
> > >
> > > After patch 1/12, we always call tlb_remove_table everywhere.
> >
> > This patch contains the hunk:
> >
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > -static inline
> > -void paravirt_tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void
> > *table)
> > -{
> > - tlb_remove_page(tlb, table);
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> >
> > That is the source of my confusion.
>
> Ah, that hunk should probably go to patch 1
>
Moved that over for the next version.
--
All Rights Reversed.
