On 20.01.25 03:40, Rik van Riel wrote:
Every pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call ends up calling tlb_remove_table.
Indeed, but the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT variant paravirt_tlb_remove_table() however calls tlb_remove_page().
tlb_remove_page() ends up in __tlb_remove_page_size()->__tlb_remove_folio_pages_size(), not in tlb_remove_table()
... but maybe I am looking at the wrong tree, so I wonder if this is okay an simply not spelled out here explicitly?
-- Cheers, David / dhildenb
