On 09/14/2012 12:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-09-12 13:28:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Has this patch been accepted?
>
> Not yet. I am waiting for Glauber to ack it.
>
I am fine with the change, assuming you tested it, after you made the
change I requested.
>>
>> On 12 September 2012 18:39, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed 12-09-12 14:56:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Wed 12-09-12 12:50:41, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> index 795e525..85ec9ff 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>>>>> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>>>>> #include "internal.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>> #include <net/sock.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>>>>> #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>>>>> struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>>>>> spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>> struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are changing this, why not test for both? This field will be
>>>>> useless with inet disabled. I usually don't like conditional in
>>>>> structures (note that the "kmem" res counter in my patchsets is not
>>>>> conditional to KMEM!!), but since the decision was made to make this one
>>>>> conditional, I think INET is a much better test. I am fine with both though.
>>>>
>>>> You are right of course. Updated patch bellow:
>>>
>>> Bahh. And I managed to send a different patch than I tested...
>>> ---
>>> From 0617ff7114bdf424160a8f1533784c837d426ec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:38:42 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: clean up networking headers file inclusion
>>>
>>> Memory controller doesn't need anything from the networking stack unless
>>> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is selected.
>>> Now we are including net/sock.h and net/tcp_memcontrol.h unconditionally
>>> which is not necessary. Moreover struct mem_cgroup contains tcp_mem even
>>> if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not selected which is not necessary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 795e525..1a217b4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>> #include <linux/oom.h>
>>> #include "internal.h"
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>> #include <net/sock.h>
>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>> #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>> struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>> spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>> struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>> @@ -413,8 +417,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
>>>
>>> /* Writing them here to avoid exposing memcg's inner layout */
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>> -#include <net/sock.h>
>>> -#include <net/ip.h>
>>>
>>> static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>> void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michal Hocko
>>> SUSE Labs
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With warm regards,
>> Sachin
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>