On Fri 14-09-12 13:28:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Has this patch been accepted?
Not yet. I am waiting for Glauber to ack it.
>
> On 12 September 2012 18:39, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed 12-09-12 14:56:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> On Wed 12-09-12 12:50:41, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> > >> index 795e525..85ec9ff 100644
> >> > >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> > >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> > >> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
> >> > >> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >> > >> #include <linux/oom.h>
> >> > >> #include "internal.h"
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> >> > >> #include <net/sock.h>
> >> > >> +#include <net/ip.h>
> >> > >> #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
> >> > >> +#endif
> >> > >>
> >> > >> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> >> > >> struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
> >> > >> spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> >> > >> struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
> >> > >> #endif
> >> > >> };
> >> >
> >> > If you are changing this, why not test for both? This field will be
> >> > useless with inet disabled. I usually don't like conditional in
> >> > structures (note that the "kmem" res counter in my patchsets is not
> >> > conditional to KMEM!!), but since the decision was made to make this one
> >> > conditional, I think INET is a much better test. I am fine with both though.
> >>
> >> You are right of course. Updated patch bellow:
> >
> > Bahh. And I managed to send a different patch than I tested...
> > ---
> > From 0617ff7114bdf424160a8f1533784c837d426ec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:38:42 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] memcg: clean up networking headers file inclusion
> >
> > Memory controller doesn't need anything from the networking stack unless
> > CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is selected.
> > Now we are including net/sock.h and net/tcp_memcontrol.h unconditionally
> > which is not necessary. Moreover struct mem_cgroup contains tcp_mem even
> > if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not selected which is not necessary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 795e525..1a217b4 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/oom.h>
> > #include "internal.h"
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
> > #include <net/sock.h>
> > +#include <net/ip.h>
> > #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
> > +#endif
> >
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >
> > @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> > struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
> > spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
> > struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
> > #endif
> > };
> > @@ -413,8 +417,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
> >
> > /* Writing them here to avoid exposing memcg's inner layout */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> > -#include <net/sock.h>
> > -#include <net/ip.h>
> >
> > static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> > void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> > --
> > Michal Hocko
> > SUSE Labs
>
>
>
> --
> With warm regards,
> Sachin
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>