On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 06:52:52PM +0800, Celeste Liu wrote: > This test checks that orig_a0 allows a syscall argument to be modified, > and that changing a0 does not change the syscall argument. > > Co-developed-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou <zhouquan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Celeste Liu <uwu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/ptrace.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..023695352215bb5de3f91c1a6f5ea3b4f9373ff9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/ptrace.c [...] > + if (ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, pid, PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY, &syscall_info_entry)) > + perr_and_exit("failed to get syscall info of entry\n"); > + result->orig_a0 = syscall_info_entry->entry.args[0]; > + if (ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, pid, PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT, &syscall_info_exit)) > + perr_and_exit("failed to get syscall info of exit\n"); > + result->a0 = syscall_info_exit->exit.rval; I'm sorry but this is not how PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO should be used. PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO operation takes a pointer and a size, and in this example instead of size you pass constants 1 and 2, which essentially means that both syscall_info_entry->entry.args[0] and syscall_info_exit->exit.rval are not going to be assigned and would just contain some garbage from the stack. Also, PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO operation returns the number of bytes available to be written by the kernel, which is always nonzero on any PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO-capable kernel. In other words, this example will always end up with perr_and_exit() call. I wonder how this test was tested before the submission. -- ldv