Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.11.24 17:12, Zi Yan wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, at 10:29, David Hildenbrand wrote:

+/* Split a multi-block free page into its individual pageblocks. */
+static void split_large_buddy(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
+			      unsigned long pfn, int order, fpi_t fpi)
+{
+	unsigned long end = pfn + (1 << order);
+
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order));
+	/* Caller removed page from freelist, buddy info cleared! */
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageBuddy(page));
+
+	if (order > pageblock_order)
+		order = pageblock_order;
+
+	while (pfn != end) {
+		int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
+
+		__free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, mt, fpi);
+		pfn += 1 << order;
+		page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+	}
+}

Hi,

stumbling over this while digging through the code ....

+
   static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
   			  unsigned long pfn, unsigned int order,
   			  fpi_t fpi_flags)
   {
   	unsigned long flags;
-	int migratetype;
    	spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
-	migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
-	__free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, fpi_flags);

This change is rather undesired:

via __free_pages_core()->__free_pages_ok() we can easily end up here with order=MAX_PAGE_ORDER.

Do you have a concrete example? PMD THP on x86_64 is pageblock_order.
We do not have PMD level mTHP yet. Any other possible source?


What your new code will do is split this perfectly reasonable MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk via split_large_buddy() into pageblock-sized chunks, and let the buddy merging logic undo our unnecessary splitting.

Is there a way to avoid this and just process the whole MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk like we used to?

Probably split_large_buddy() can check the migratetypes of the to-be-freed
page, if order > pageblock_order. If all migratetypes are the same, the page
can be freed at MAX_PAGE_ORDER, otherwise pageblock_order.

Thinking about this: why do we care about the migratetype?

We only have to fallback to pageblocks if any pageblock is "MIGRATE_ISOLATE" (and maybe MIGRATE_CMA), but not all. Otherwise, we can just ignore the migratetype (or rather overwrite it)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux