On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:57 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:53:35 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > > This is part 1 of "Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache", > > which mainly contain refactoring and optimization for the > > implementation of page_frag API before the replacing. > > Looks like Alex is happy with all of these patches. Since > page_frag_cache is primarily used in networking I think it's > okay for us to apply it but I wanted to ask if anyone: > - thinks this shouldn't go in; > - needs more time to review; > - prefers to take it via their own tree. Yeah. I was happy with the set. Just curious about the numbers as they hadn't been updated, but I am satisfied with the numbers provided after I pointed that out. - Alex
