On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:53:35 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > This is part 1 of "Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache", > which mainly contain refactoring and optimization for the > implementation of page_frag API before the replacing. Looks like Alex is happy with all of these patches. Since page_frag_cache is primarily used in networking I think it's okay for us to apply it but I wanted to ask if anyone: - thinks this shouldn't go in; - needs more time to review; - prefers to take it via their own tree.
