On 10/22/24 16:24, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2024, Dave Hansen wrote: > >> So I think Peter's version was the best. It shuts up clang and also >> preserves the existing (good) gcc 'sub' behavior. I'll send it out for >> real in a bit, but I'm thinking of something like the attached patch. > The desired behavior is a "dec". "sub" has a longer op code AFAICT. Gah, yes, of course. I misspoke. We want "inc" and "dec" for +1 and -1. "add" and "sub" are heftier and get used for everything else.
