Re: [PATCH 3/4] LoongArch: Add barrier between set_pte and memory access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Huacai,

On 2024/10/12 上午10:16, Huacai Chen wrote:
Hi, Bibo,

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:50 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It is possible to return a spurious fault if memory is accessed
right after the pte is set. For user address space, pte is set
in kernel space and memory is accessed in user space, there is
long time for synchronization, no barrier needed. However for
kernel address space, it is possible that memory is accessed
right after the pte is set.

Here flush_cache_vmap/flush_cache_vmap_early is used for
synchronization.

Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index f8754d08a31a..53be231319ef 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -42,12 +42,24 @@ void local_flush_icache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
  #define flush_cache_dup_mm(mm)                         do { } while (0)
  #define flush_cache_range(vma, start, end)             do { } while (0)
  #define flush_cache_page(vma, vmaddr, pfn)             do { } while (0)
-#define flush_cache_vmap(start, end)                   do { } while (0)
  #define flush_cache_vunmap(start, end)                 do { } while (0)
  #define flush_icache_user_page(vma, page, addr, len)   do { } while (0)
  #define flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping)                        do { } while (0)
  #define flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping)              do { } while (0)

+/*
+ * It is possible for a kernel virtual mapping access to return a spurious
+ * fault if it's accessed right after the pte is set. The page fault handler
+ * does not expect this type of fault. flush_cache_vmap is not exactly the
+ * right place to put this, but it seems to work well enough.
+ */
+static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+       smp_mb();
+}
I don't know whether this is the best API to do this, and I think
flush_cache_vunmap() also should be a smp_mb().
I do not know neither -:(, it seems that flush_cache_vmap() is better than arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), since function flush_cache_vmap() is used in vmalloc/kasan/percpu module, however arch_sync_kernel_mappings
is only used in vmalloc.

For flush_cache_vunmap(), it is used before pte_clear(), here is usage example.
void vunmap_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
{
        flush_cache_vunmap(addr, end);
        vunmap_range_noflush(addr, end);
        flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
}

So I think it is not necessary to add smp_mb() in flush_cache_vunmap().

Regards
Bibo Mao


Huacai

+#define flush_cache_vmap flush_cache_vmap
+#define flush_cache_vmap_early flush_cache_vmap
+
  #define cache_op(op, addr)                                             \
         __asm__ __volatile__(                                           \
         "       cacop   %0, %1                                  \n"     \
--
2.39.3






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux