On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:03:05AM GMT, Wei Yang wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:03:35PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:39:50PM GMT, Wei Yang wrote: > >> Patch 1/2: some fields of the maple_alloc is not necessary to change, so we > >> can skip some operations > >> Patch 3: a valid alloc check could be hide in current code, so we don't need > >> to do a separate check > >> Patch 4: found on rare case where allocation would fail even has enough > >> memory > >> > >> Wei Yang (4): > >> maple_tree: clear request_count for new allocated one > >> maple_tree: total is not changed for nomem_one case > >> maple_tree: simplify mas_push_node() > >> maple_tree: fix potential allocation failure even has memory > >> > >> lib/maple_tree.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- > >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > >> > > > >Andrew - Liam is away at the moment - could we hold off on taking this > >series to unstable until he's back and had a chance to review please? > > > >It may be best to avoid taking maple tree changes other than urgent bug > >fixes or the like until his return also. > > > >Wei - please hold off on series like this until Liam's had a chance to > >reply to this thread. Thanks! > > Sure, let me know when it is ok. Thanks, Liam should reply to the thread once he's back then we're good to go :) > > BTW, I don't see Andrew has taken it in unstable. Do I miss the mail? Yeah he's not taken yet, kind of getting ahead of things here - not a comment on your series - more an act of time/resource management :) Cheers! > > -- > Wei Yang > Help you, Help me >
