Re: [PATCH 0/4] cleanup maple_alloc related functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:39:50PM GMT, Wei Yang wrote:
> Patch 1/2: some fields of the maple_alloc is not necessary to change, so we
>            can skip some operations
> Patch 3: a valid alloc check could be hide in current code, so we don't need
>          to do a separate check
> Patch 4: found on rare case where allocation would fail even has enough
>          memory
>
> Wei Yang (4):
>   maple_tree: clear request_count for new allocated one
>   maple_tree: total is not changed for nomem_one case
>   maple_tree: simplify mas_push_node()
>   maple_tree: fix potential allocation failure even has memory
>
>  lib/maple_tree.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>

Andrew - Liam is away at the moment - could we hold off on taking this
series to unstable until he's back and had a chance to review please?

It may be best to avoid taking maple tree changes other than urgent bug
fixes or the like until his return also.

Wei - please hold off on series like this until Liam's had a chance to
reply to this thread. Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux