On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There >>> are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland >>> ABIs. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------- >>> KOSAKI Motohiro (6): >>> Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle >>> vma->vm_policy linkages" >>> mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing >>> mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() >>> mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() >>> mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in >>> alloc_pages_vma() >>> MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry >>> >>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ >>> mm/mempolicy.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>> mm/shmem.c | 9 ++-- >>> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, >> mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still >> needed? > > Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since > Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages" patch. The series still isn't queued anywhere. Are you planning on resending it again, or should it get picked up in a particular tree? josh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>