On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Hi >> >> This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There >> are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland >> ABIs. >> >> Thanks. >> >> changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> KOSAKI Motohiro (6): >> Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle >> vma->vm_policy linkages" >> mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing >> mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() >> mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() >> mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in >> alloc_pages_vma() >> MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry >> >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ >> mm/mempolicy.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> mm/shmem.c | 9 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, > mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still > needed? Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages" patch. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>