On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 2:03 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 01:57:12PM +0100, Gary Guo wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 02:11:08 +0200 > > Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Add maintainers entry for the Rust `alloc` module. > > > > > > Currently, this includes the `Allocator` API itself, `Allocator` > > > implementations, such as `Kmalloc` or `Vmalloc`, as well as the kernel's > > > implementation of the primary memory allocation data structures, `Box` > > > and `Vec`. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 42decde38320..560516b3aaf4 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -19925,6 +19925,13 @@ F: scripts/*rust* > > > F: tools/testing/selftests/rust/ > > > K: \b(?i:rust)\b > > > > > > +RUST [ALLOC] > > > +M: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > +L: rust-for-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > +S: Maintained > > > +F: rust/kernel/alloc.rs > > > +F: rust/kernel/alloc/ > > > > It feels like we should use `mod.rs`. > > The same would be true for: > > - rust/kernel/sync.rs > - rust/kernel/net.rs > - rust/kernel/init.rs > - rust/kernel/fs.rs > - ... > > Do you propose to change it for all of them? I do actually think `mod.rs` is superior in general, but it's probably not worth changing it right now. Alice
