On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:31 AM Aithal, Srikanth <sraithal@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/25/2024 11:25 AM, Piotr Oniszczuk wrote: > > > > > >> Wiadomość napisana przez Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> w dniu 23.08.2024, o godz. 18:16: > >> > >> > >> Have you tried with 6.9 yet? IIRC, there are two major changes to > >> zswap architecture in recent versions. > >> > >> 1. In 6.9, we range-partition zswap's rbtrees to reduce lock contention. > >> > > > > Ok - after 32h of continuous compilation also on 6.9.12 I got series of oops (see below). > > > I hit similar soft lockup with linuxnext-20240902 build, but I was not > running anything for that long. Once I hit it while kexecing on > linuxnext-20240902 and other time was during linuxnext-20240902 boot up. > I have attached the logs here, I am trying to see if I can recreate it > on todays linux-next build. This doesn't look like the same problem to me. I do not see any zswap functions in the backtrace, I see fuse stuff. Please send a separate bug report to the relevant mailing lists (probably linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
