On 08/07/2012 05:59 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 06/29/2012 02:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400 >> Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> ... >>> >> >> OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this >> discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to >> go through this all again. And let's remember this in the next >> patchset! >> >>> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to >>> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going >>> back to it, and agreeing in the final form. >> >> Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a >> reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base >> patchset. >> > So, that was posted separately as well. > > Although there is a thing to fix here and there - all of them I am > working on already - I believe that to be mature enough. > > Do you have any comments on that? Would you be willing to take this > first part (modified with the comments on this thread itself) and let it > start sitting in the tree? > In the mean time, for any interested parties, I've set up a tree at: git://github.com/glommer/linux.git branches kmemcg-slab and kmemcg-stack Intended to be a throw-away tree. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>