Re: Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> ...
>

OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this
discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to
go through this all again.  And let's remember this in the next
patchset!

> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to
> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going
> back to it, and agreeing in the final form.

Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a
reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base
patchset.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]