On 8/9/24 17:12, Jann Horn wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 5:02 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 8/7/24 12:31, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> > Also in git: >> > https://git.kernel.org/vbabka/l/slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2r2 >> >> I've added this to slab/for-next, there will be some conflicts and here's my >> resulting git show or the merge commit I tried over today's next. >> >> It might look a bit different with tomorrow's next as mm will have v7 of the >> conflicting series from Jann: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1ca6275f-a2fc-4bad-81dc-6257d4f8d750@xxxxxxx/ >> >> (also I did resolve it in the way I suggested to move Jann's block before >> taking slab_mutex() but unless that happens in mm-unstable it would probably be more >> correct to keep where he did) > > Regarding my conflicting patch: Do you want me to send a v8 of that > one now to move things around in my patch as you suggested? Or should > we do that in the slab tree after the conflict has been resolved in > Linus' tree, or something like that? > I'm not sure which way of doing this would minimize work for maintainers... I guess it would be easiest to send a -fix to Andrew as it's rather minor change. Thanks!
