On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 5:02 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/7/24 12:31, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > Also in git: > > https://git.kernel.org/vbabka/l/slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2r2 > > I've added this to slab/for-next, there will be some conflicts and here's my > resulting git show or the merge commit I tried over today's next. > > It might look a bit different with tomorrow's next as mm will have v7 of the > conflicting series from Jann: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1ca6275f-a2fc-4bad-81dc-6257d4f8d750@xxxxxxx/ > > (also I did resolve it in the way I suggested to move Jann's block before > taking slab_mutex() but unless that happens in mm-unstable it would probably be more > correct to keep where he did) Regarding my conflicting patch: Do you want me to send a v8 of that one now to move things around in my patch as you suggested? Or should we do that in the slab tree after the conflict has been resolved in Linus' tree, or something like that? I'm not sure which way of doing this would minimize work for maintainers...
