* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [240808 00:38]: > If entry is a special case, we need to expand root to store it. This > case is exactly the case of xa_is_internal(). > > Let's use xa_is_internal() for the check, which is friendly for > audience. Nack This check is to see if it will be detected as an internal node - this much is correct. But changing the check to use this function reads far worse than what exists today. If you look at the code below, it seems to indicate that the internal entry is being inserted into the tree - but it's not an internal entry, it's an entry that would be detected as an internal entry. This is not friendlier for the audience, it's confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/maple_tree.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c > index aa3a5df15b8e..d39b0bceb802 100644 > --- a/lib/maple_tree.c > +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c > @@ -3515,7 +3515,7 @@ static inline void mas_store_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry) > { > if (likely((mas->last != 0) || (mas->index != 0))) > mas_root_expand(mas, entry); > - else if (((unsigned long) (entry) & 3) == 2) > + else if (xa_is_internal(entry)) > mas_root_expand(mas, entry); > else { > rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, entry); > -- > 2.34.1 >