On (24/07/31 12:14), Alex Shi wrote: > > A bit of a different thing, still documentation related tho: do > > we want to do something about comments that mention page_lock in > > zsmalloc.c? > > Good question! > > There are some comments mentioned about the page_lock in the file, but missed > in the header of file, so how about the following adding: And e.g. things like `The page locks trylock_zspage got will be released by __free_zspage.` Should this (and the rest) spell "zpdesc locks" or something? Or do we still want to refer to it as "page lock"?
