On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 14:48, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Have you a plan to 'fix' min3() ?
I didn't have a test-case that showed it being a problem, particularly
after min() no longer expands exponentially, but maybe something like
the attached would work?
All the infrastructure is in place for it, this just uses it.
Does this work for you? Was there some particularly bad case you were
looking at that I missed?
Linus
include/linux/minmax.h | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/minmax.h b/include/linux/minmax.h
index 41da6f85a407..98008dd92153 100644
--- a/include/linux/minmax.h
+++ b/include/linux/minmax.h
@@ -152,13 +152,20 @@
#define umax(x, y) \
__careful_cmp(max, (x) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, (y) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull)
+#define __careful_op3(op, x, y, z, ux, uy, uz) ({ \
+ __auto_type ux = (x); __auto_type uy = (y);__auto_type uz = (z);\
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__types_ok3(x,y,z,ux,uy,uz), \
+ #op"3("#x", "#y", "#z") signedness error"); \
+ __cmp(op, ux, __cmp(op, uy, uz)); })
+
/**
* min3 - return minimum of three values
* @x: first value
* @y: second value
* @z: third value
*/
-#define min3(x, y, z) min((typeof(x))min(x, y), z)
+#define min3(x, y, z) \
+ __careful_op3(min, x, y, z, __UNIQUE_ID(x_), __UNIQUE_ID(y_), __UNIQUE_ID(z_))
/**
* max3 - return maximum of three values
@@ -166,7 +173,8 @@
* @y: second value
* @z: third value
*/
-#define max3(x, y, z) max((typeof(x))max(x, y), z)
+#define max3(x, y, z) \
+ __careful_op3(max, x, y, z, __UNIQUE_ID(x_), __UNIQUE_ID(y_), __UNIQUE_ID(z_))
/**
* min_not_zero - return the minimum that is _not_ zero, unless both are zero
