2024年7月27日(土) 3:01 Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:54 AM Takero Funaki <flintglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes, the `++progress` counts both error and success as an iteration > > progress for valid memcgs (not writeback amount). Incrementing only on > > success will overly increment failures counter if there is only one > > memcg, one from writeback failure and one from tree walk ends, the > > worker aborts on 8 failures instead of 16. > > `++candidates;` would be better? replacing the name and fixing commit > > messages for v4. > > How about `attempt` or `attempted`? Naming is hard :) Thanks. Rewriting with `attempts` in align with the `failures` counter.
