On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:54 AM Takero Funaki <flintglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, the `++progress` counts both error and success as an iteration > progress for valid memcgs (not writeback amount). Incrementing only on > success will overly increment failures counter if there is only one > memcg, one from writeback failure and one from tree walk ends, the > worker aborts on 8 failures instead of 16. > `++candidates;` would be better? replacing the name and fixing commit > messages for v4. How about `attempt` or `attempted`? Naming is hard :)