On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > That said, unless I am missing something, you seem to have added nothing > in the middle of the series, all new patches go in the end. Am I right? Correct.\ > In this case, we could merge patches 1-9 if Pekka is fine with them, and > then move on. I'd say take it from the top and merge as much patch as we can get into a a shapre where we have confidence in the approach being right and the patches being workable. The first 2 patches should go directly into the tree since they just improve debuggability and the second patch actually fixes a memory leak. The next couple could go into next. Not sure where that would end but we have a long road to go (and I have lots of patches that have not seen the daylight yet) and therefore I would suggest to work the next two weeks on cranking out as much as possible and get what we can into -next. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>