On Fri 19-07-24 12:35:55, Barry Song wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 8:50 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > Yes, those shouldn't really fail. NOWAIT|NOFAIL was something that > > should never happen and I really hope it doesn't. Others should really > > retry but it's been some time since I've checked the last time. > > > I assume allocations directly using alloc_pages() might not respect GFP_NOFAIL > and violate the semantics of GFP_NOFAIL. What do you mean? > Additionally, at least drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c is > incorrect with GFP_ATOMIC > | __GFP_NOFAIL. This is broken! Please bring this up with the maintainer of the code. [...] > GFP_NOFAIL things need to be fixed. Let me investigate further. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs