On 2024/7/1 10:20, Chengming Zhou wrote:
On 2024/7/1 09:37, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (24/06/28 11:19), Chengming Zhou wrote:
Andrew, could you please help to change the subject as Sergey asked?
Sorry, I should have noted these details in the changelog when I wrote
this subject.
Chengming, can I ask you to resend these patches with a proper commit
message?
Of course, will update and send later.
I just pulled mm/mm-unstable and ready to update, but find Andrew has
already helped to change the subject and commit message as below, which
is great enough! Thanks!
commit 84d0abc5905bbdf29dc7ff8083d21145d78a3ffe
Author: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jun 27 15:59:58 2024 +0800
mm/zsmalloc: clarify class per-fullness zspage counts
We always use insert_zspage() and remove_zspage() to update zspage's
fullness location, which will account correctly.
But this special async free path use "splice" instead of
remove_zspage(),
so the per-fullness zspage count for ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0 won't decrease.
Clean things up by decreasing when iterate over the zspage free list.
This doesn't actually fix anything. ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0 is just a
"placeholder" which is never used anywhere.
Link:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240627075959.611783-1-chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
