On (24/06/27 15:59), Chengming Zhou wrote: > We always use insert_zspage() and remove_zspage() to update zspage's > fullness location, which will account correctly. > > But this special async free path use "splice" instead of remove_zspage(), > so the per-fullness zspage count for ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0 won't decrease. > > Fix it by decreasing when iterate over the zspage free list. So this doesn't fix anything. ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0 is just a "placeholder" which is never used anywhere. We can land this patch, if you insist/prefer, but it's some sort of a NOOP, essentially (in a sense that it has no visible effects).
